Empirical analysis of Hungarian firms according to venture capital investment criteria

Authors

  • Judit Edit FUTÓ University of Debrecen Author

Keywords:

venture capital, institutional investors, firms, cluster analysis

Abstract

Over the past decade the venture capital industry has become more and more prominent, not just on a global level, but in Hungary, too. Thanks to the JEREMIE Program a large number of new venture capital firms are located in our country, and therefore an investment wave has started. The main topic of the paper relates to the selection of firms for venture capital investment; therefore, in the first part of the study I briefly summarize a general venture capital investment process, highlighting both the selection process and the criteria used for selection. Then I propose 3 indexes (trustworthiness index, openness index, investment index), which we have created to help venture capitalists to decide whether the targeted enterprises are appropriate for them, or not. In the main part of the paper I provide a classification of micro- and small sized Hungarian firms based on my own survey, and I analyze what kind of relationship exists between the proposed indexes and the type of the classified firms. The result of the classification is that I identify four main firm types and, based on statistical tests, it can be said that there is no significant relationship between the trustworthiness index and the clusters, but that there are between the two other indexes and the clusters.

Author Biography

  • Judit Edit FUTÓ, University of Debrecen
    Faculty of Economics and Business

    PhD student

References

<p><strong>References</strong></p><p>Banyár, L. &amp; Csáki, B. (2006): A kockázatitőke-ágazat jogi szabályozása Magyarországon. In Zs. Makra (Eds.), <em>A kockázati tőke világa</em> (pp. 183-199). Budapest: Aula.</p><p>Cumming, D., Schmidt, D. &amp; Walz, U. (2010): Legality and venture capital governance around the world. <em>Journal of Business Venturing</em>, 25, 54-72. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.537243">http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.537243 </a></p><p>Fried, V. H., &amp; Hisrich, R. D. (1994): Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making. <em>Financial Management</em>, 23 (3), <em>Venture Capital Special Issue</em> (autumn), 28-37. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665619">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665619 </a></p><p>Futó J., &amp; Szobonya P. (2012): Ki szereti a kockázati tőkét? Kit szeret a kockázati tőke? <em>HÉTFA Kutatóintézet</em>, Bizalom és Vállalkozás Program, Szakmai háttér IX., A HÉTFA Kutatóintézet és a Compleo közös kiadványa, Budapest, ISSN 2062-3798 Retrieved from http://hetfa.hu/wp-content/uploads/SZH09_vc.pdf</p><p>Hall, J.,&amp; Hofer, C. W. (1993): Venture Capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evalutation. <em>Journal of Business Venturing</em> 8, 25-42. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026%2893%2990009-t">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90009-t </a></p><p>Karsai, J. (2006): A magyarországi kockázatitőke-finanszírozás másfél évtizede (1989-2004) In Zs. Makra (Eds.), <em>A kockázati tőke világa</em> (pp. 33-52). Budapest: Aula.</p><p>Karsai, J. (2012): <em>A kapitalizmus új királyai. Kockázati tőke Magyarországon és a közép-kelet-európai régióban.</em> Budapest: Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány, MTA KRTK KTI</p><p>Karsai, J. (2013): Válság után: változó állami szerep a kockázatitőke-ágazatban, <em>Külgazdaság</em>, LVII. május-június, 12-34.</p><p>Khanin, D., Baum, J. R., Mahto, R. V., &amp; Heller, C. (2008): Venture capitalists’ investment criteria: 40 years of research. <em>Small Business Institute,</em> Research Review, Vol. 35</p><p>Kollmann, T., &amp; Kuckertz, A. (2009): Evaluation uncertainty of venture capitalists’ investment criteria. <em>Journal of Business Research</em> 63, 741-747. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.004">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.004 </a></p><p class="Default">Macmillan, I. C., &amp; Siegel, R. &amp; Narasimha, S. P.N. (1985): Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. <em>Journal of Business Venturing,</em> 1,119-128. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026%2885%2990011-4">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4 </a></p><p>MNB (2015): <em>Elemzés a hazai kockázati tőkealap-kezelők és alapok működéséről.</em> Retrieved from http://www.hvca.hu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Elemzes_a_kovkazati_tokealapkezeloi_szektorrol_0202.pdf</p><p>Survey (2011): <em>HÉTFA Kutatóintézet</em>, Bizalom és Vállalkozás Program, Szakmai háttér IX., Budapest, ISSN 2062-3798 Retrieved from http://hetfa.hu/wp-content/uploads/SZH09_vc.pdf</p><p>Tyebjee, T. T., &amp; Bruno, V. A. (1984): A model of venture capitalist investment activity. <em>Management Science</em>, 30 (9) <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051">http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051 </a></p><p>Zacharakis, A. L., &amp; Meyer, D. G. (1998): A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? <em>Journal of Business Venturing</em>, 13, 57-76 <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026%2897%2900004-9">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00004-9</a></p>

Downloads

Published

2016-10-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Empirical analysis of Hungarian firms according to venture capital investment criteria. (2016). Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 9(1), 16-32. https://www.tjeb.ro/index.php/tjeb/article/view/TJEB9-1_16to31