Testing the violation of conservatism accounting principle. Case study on Romanian listed entities

Ovidiu BUNGET; Eusebiu BUREANA

Ovidiu BUNGET West University of Timisoara
Eusebiu BUREANA West University of Timisoara

Keywords: Conservatism Principle, Econometric Models, Financial and Non-Financial Indicators

Abstract

From the beginning of the debates regarding the conservatism principle, the concept experienced a significant development. As it is one of the most controversial and violated accounting principle, we started to seek how can we help one of the auditor’s challenge in the audit mission: to identify and evaluate the risks from the financial statement level. The most affected accounting principle in Romania is the conservatism principle. After a long time of debates, it was stated that the conservatism principle, considered to be complementary to the “fair view” concept, which means that financial reports shall be required to submit information so impartial and in such a manner as to enable the reader to understand them clearly. Considered as a risk that should be identified, this study demonstrates a relationship between the violation of the conservatism principle and the analysis of the financial indicators, such as: Long-Term-Debt-to-Equity Ratio; Debt-to-Equity Ratio; Global Solvency Ratio; Operating Margin Ratio; Current Finance Ratio; Period of Activity Indicator and Auditor Indicator. Based on a quantitative method, this analyze was realized through three econometric model performed on annual financial statements of the companies from Bucharest Stock Exchange. After validating the sample and analyzing the factorial variables, we selected the best model: the probit model. In conclusion, as can be seen in the paper, the econometric function is efficient, reliable and can be applied to assess the risk likelihood for violating the conservatism principle by a Romanian company.

Author Biographies

Ovidiu BUNGET, West University of Timisoara

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Acoounting Department

Associate Professor, PhD

Eusebiu BUREANA, West University of Timisoara

MSc Graduate

References

Achim, M.-V., Mare, C., & Borlea, S.-N. (2012). A Statistical Model of Financial Risk Bankruptcy Applied for Romanian Manufacturing Industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 3, 132–137

Baker, C.-R., & Burlaud, A. (2014). From Accounting Theory To Conceptual Framework. Audit Financiar Journal, Year XII, No. 116, 8, 49-62

Barth, M.-E. (2006). Including Estimates Of The Future In Today’s Financial Statements. Accounting Horizons, 20, 271-285.

Barth, M.-E., & Landsman, W.-R. (2010). How Did Financial Reporting Contribute To The Financial Crisis?. European Accounting Review, 19(3), 399-423.

Basu, S. (1997). The Conservatism Principle And The Asymmetric Timeliness Of Earnings. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 24(1), 3-37.

Bliss, J. -H. (1924). Management Through Accounts. New York: The Ronald Press Co.

Bordeianu, S. (2006). Diagnostic Analysis Based On Rentabilities. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 8(2).

Bueno C.-E., Cruz R.-I., & Durȧn H.-J. (1992). Economica de la empresa. Anȧlisis de las decisions empresariales. Madrid: Ed. Pirȧmide, S.A.

Bunget, C.-O., & Dumitrescu, A. (2012). Study On The Relation Between The Audit Opinion And The Esteeming Of Accounting Principles. Audit Financiar Journal, Year X, no. 85, 1, 6–12.

Bunget, C.-O., Dumitrescu, A., & Deliu, D. (2013). The Manipulation And Truncation Of Accounting Information And The Impact On The Decisional Process Of The Stakeholders. Annals. Economics Science Series. Timisoara, XIX , 84–96.

Bureana, R.-E., & Bordea, R.-A. (2014). Applicative Model with Regard to Testing the Risk of Affecting the Prudence Principle for Romanian Listed Companies. Audit Financiar Journal, Year XII, no. 118, 10, 13–22.

Collins, W., & Hopwood, W.-S. (1980). A Multivariate Analysis Of Annual Earnings Forecasts Generated From Quarterly Forecasts Of Financial Analysis And Univariate Time-Series Models. Journal of Accounting Research, 390 – 406.

Comprix, J., Muller, K. A., & Sinclair, J. (2012). Mandatory Accounting Requirements and Demand for Big Four Auditors: evidence from IFRS Adoption in the EU. MEAFA. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/business/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/121764/Muller_MEAFA_2012.pdf.

Demaria, S., & Dufour, D. (2007). First Time Adoption Of IFRS, Fair Value Option, Conservatism: Evidences From French Listed Companies. 30 eme colloque de l'EAA, April.

Dima, M., Dima, B., & Farcane, N. (2013). Determinants of Financial Auditor Choice for the Entities Listed on Bucharest Stock Exchange. Audit Financiar Journal, Year XI, No. 99, 3, 18–28.

Domnisoru, S., Buziernescu, R., & Roman, A. (2013). A Model For Configuring The Potential Of Modeling The Published Corporative Information. Audit Financiar Journal, Year XI, No. 99, 3, 3–17.

Dumitrescu, A. (2010). The Detection Of Frauds And Errors Within The Financial Audit Process. PhD Thesis, West University of Timisoara.

Feleagă, L., & Feleagă, N. (2007). Financial Accounting – An European and International Approach, second edition, Volume 1. Bucharest: Economics Publishing.

Fields, T., Lys, T., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical Research On Accounting Choice. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 31, 255–307.

Ganea, M., & Cârstina, S. (2013). Econometric Model to Quantify the Performance of Romanian Enterprises, Audit Financiar Journal, Year XI, No. 106, 10, 46-57.

Gillis, G.-J. (1977). Measurement Of Prudence - Securities And Regulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 33(1), 8–35.

Gujarati, D.-N. (2003). Basic econometrics, United States: McGraw-Hill International Editions: Economic Series.

Hoetker, G. (2007). The Use Of Logit And Probit Models In Strategic Management Research: Critical Issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, February, 331 – 343

Hope, O.-K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yoo, Y.-K. (2008). Culture And Auditor Choice: A Test Of The Secrecy Hypothesis. Journal Of Accounting Public Policy, 27, 357–373.

Jackson, R. H.-G., & Wood, A.–J. (2013). The Performance Of Insolvency Prediction And Credit Risk Models In The UK: A Comparative Study. The British Accounting Review, 45(3), 183 – 202.

Kothari, S.-P., Ramanna, K., & Skinner, D.-J. (2010). Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of Positive Research in Accounting. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 50(2-3), 246-286.

Ohlson, J.-A. (1980). Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy. Journal Of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.

Manolescu, I (2005). Estimating Optimal Ratio Of Indebtedness In An Instable Environment. Scientific Annals Of “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Of Iasi, L/LI, 685-690.

Messier, W.-F., Glover, S.-M., & Prawitt, D.-F. (2008). Auditing and Assurance Services A Systematic Approach. 5th Ed., New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.

Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2008). Comparative International Accounting. 10^th edition. Essex: Prentice Hall – Financial Times.

Robu, B., Robu, M., & Mironiuc, M. (2012). A Practical Model for Testing the "Going-Concern" Assumption in the Financial Audit Engagement for Romanian Quoted Companies. Audit Financiar Journal. Year X, no. 86, 2, 3–16.

Tole, M. (2000). Entities Financial Analysis. Bucharest: Foundation of Tomorrow Romania Publishing.

Toma, M. (2012). Initiation In Financial Audit For A Entity, 4^th Edition, revised. Bucharest: C.E.C.C.A.R. Publishing.

Toma, C., & Robu. I. B. (2014). Study on the Role of Financial Auditing to Ensure the Conservatism in Financial Reporting, Audit Financiar Journal, 117(9), 3–16.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131 – 156.

Wang, Y.-J., & Lee, H.-S. (2008). A Clustering Method To Identify Representative Financial Ratios. Information Sciences, 178(4), 1087 – 1097.

Zavgren C. (1983). The Prediction of Corporate Failure: The State of the Art, Journal of Accounting Literature,2, 1-38.