Stimulating Creativity Methods and Innovative Performance in European Countries

  • Gabriela Lucia SIPOS West University of Timisoara
  • Alin IONESCU West University of Timisoara
Keywords: Innovation, innovative performance, creativity methods

Abstract

A widely debated topic during the last decades focuses on the companies’ opportunities to acquire corporate competitiveness due to research, innovation and development. Thus, in the context of increased competition and current global challenges, fostering creativity and innovation is a way to boost economic growth and welfare of European countries. New and original ideas, skills, competencies and innovations they all could enable to achieve competitive advantages. Creative ideas and innovative solutions are crucial for the European countries in order to overcome the current economic crisis.

This paper aims to study the impact of stimulating creativity methods used by companies on innovative performance of the country. The study is based on identifying correlations between using stimulating creativity methods – such as brainstorming sessions, financial incentives for employees to develop new ideas, job rotation of staff, multidisciplinary or cross-functional work teams, non-financial incentives for employees and training employees on how to develop new ideas or creativity – and, by the other hand, innovative performance of European countries, synthetically expressed by Summary Innovation Index. It also quantifies and scales the intensity of influence using each stimulating creativity method.

The results of this study can be a real help for companies to identify the most appropriate stimulating creativity methods in order to increase the innovative performance. Thereby, the main output of the study consists in the fact that using the most effective methods of stimulating creativity the companies will be able to increase their innovative potential and they could obtain long-term competitive advantages.

Author Biographies

Gabriela Lucia SIPOS, West University of Timisoara
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Alin IONESCU, West University of Timisoara
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration

References

Adams, K. (2006). The Sources of Innovation and Creativity, New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. NCEE- National Center on Education and the Economy. Retrieved from http://www.fpspi.org/pdf/innovcreativity.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2014.

Agars, M. D., Kaufman, J. C., & Locke, T. R. (2008). Social Influence and Creativity in Organizations: A Multi-Level Lens for Theory, Research, and Practice. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter, & K. E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.). Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Research in Multi Level Issues (Volume 7, pp. 3-61). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Alba, M. F., Alvarez-Coque, J. M. G., & Mas-Verdu, F. (2011). New Firm Creation and Innovation: Industrial Patterns and Inter-Sectoral Linkages. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(4), 501-519. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0210-3

Andriopoulos, C., & Lowe, A. (2000). Enhancing Organizational Creativity: The Process of Perpetual Challenging. Management Decision, 38, 734 – 742.

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47, 1323 – 1339.

Berenson M. L., Levine D. M., & Krehbiel T. C. (2012). Basic Business Statistics. Concepts and Applications, 12th Edition, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

Baucus, M. S., Norton, W. I., Baucus, D. A., & Human, S. E. (2008). Fostering Creativity and Innovation without Encouraging Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 97-115.

Bobirca, A., & Draghici, A. (2011). Creativity and Economic Development. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Issue 59. Retrieved from http://waset.org/publications/615/
creativity-and-economic-development. Accessed 18 November 2014.

Crespi, G., Arias-Ortiz, E., Tacsir, E., Vargas, F., Zuniga, P. (2014). Innovation for Economic Performance: The Case of Latin American Firms, Eurasian Business Review, 4(1), 31-50, doi: 10.1007/s40821-014-0001-1.

Ehigie, B. O., & McAndrew, E. B. (2005). Innovation, Diffusion and Adoption of Total Quality Management (TQM). Management Decision, 43, 925 – 940.

European Commission. (2011). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2011_en.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2013.

European Commission, Eurostat. Proportion of innovative enterprises by type of methods for stimulating creativity considered highly successful 2008–2010. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Innovation_statistics. Accessed 30 January 2013

European Commission. (2013). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. European Commission, Brussels.

Heslin, P. A. (2009). Better than Brainstorming? Potential Contextual Boundary Conditions to Brainwriting for Idea Generation in Organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 129–145.

Hollanders, H. (2009). Measuring Innovation: The European Innovation Scoreboard. In E. Villalba, (Ed.), Measuring Creativity, Proceedings for the Conference “Can creativity be measured?”, Brussels.

Hollanders, H., & van Cruysen, A. (2009). Design, Creativity and Innovation: A Scoreboard Approach, INNO Metrics 2008 report, Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise.

Miller, C., & Osborn, R. (2008). Innovation as a Contested Terrain: Planned Creativity and Innovation versus Emergent Creativity and Innovation. In M., D. Mumford, S., T. Hunter, & K., E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Research in Multi Level Issues, (Volume 7, pp. 169-189), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Mohnen, P. & Hall, B.H. (2013). Innovation and Productivity: An Update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47-65, DOI 10.14208/BF03353817.

Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for Innovation: A Multi-Level Perspective. in M., D. Mumford, S., T. Hunter, & K., E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Research in Multi Level Issues, (Volume 7, pp. 107-154), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

OECD (2009). Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-term Growth. OECD, Paris.

Ortega, J. (2001). Job Rotation as a Learning Mechanism. Management Science, 47, 1361-1370.

Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The Impact of Financial and Nonfinancial Incentives on Business-unit Outcomes over Time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 156–165.

Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three Avenues for Future Research on Creativity, Innovation, and Initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.

Sacramento, C. A., Dawson, J. F., & West, M., A. (2008). Team creativity: more than the sum of its parts? In M., D. Mumford, S., T. Hunter, & K., E. Bedell-Avers (Ed.), Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Research in Multi Level Issues, (Volume 7, pp. 269-287), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Stolarick, K., & Florida, R. (2006). Creativity, Connections and Innovation: A Study of Linkages in the Montreal Region. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1799-1817.

Thompson, J. (2004). Innovation through People. Management Decision, 42(9), 1082-1094.

Torun, H., & Cicekci, C. (2007). Innovation: Is the Engine for the Economic Growth? EGE University. The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Economics IV, 1-54.

Tsai, K-H., & Yang, S-Y. (2014). The Contingent Value of Firm Innovativeness for Business Performance under Environmental Turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 343-366. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0225-4
Published
2015-06-30
How to Cite
SIPOS, G., & IONESCU, A. (2015). Stimulating Creativity Methods and Innovative Performance in European Countries. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 8(1), 163-182. Retrieved from https://www.tjeb.ro/index.php/tjeb/article/view/TJEB8-1_163to182
Section
Articles