Changing economic positions of the regions during the post-crisis decade in Hungary

  • Zsuzsanna Zsibok
Keywords: Labour productivity, Regional inequalities, Long-term analysis

Abstract

Most Central and Eastern European countries converged to the EU average in terms of per capita GDP over the post-crisis decade, which was mostly fueled by the increase of employment. At the same time, labour productivity increased at a significantly slower pace, or it even decreased in some years or areas in real terms, which was also the case in Hungary. The most successful regions were not definitely the capital regions, but those that relied heavily on FDI inflow. However, in the last few years of the previous decade, as a result of the high-pressure economy, economic dynamism reappeared in the central region of Hungary and it regained its leading position. We intend to study the regional dynamics of the growth factors over the period after the global financial and economic crisis in Hungary; and to assess the importance of FDI in determining these growth trends. We use explorative statistical methods to analyze the decade-long economic trends regarding the most important labour-market and output indicators at the NUTS3 level provided by the Hungarian Central Statistical Office. The main message of our paper is that for regions with a high degree of FDI their sectoral structure ensures economic stability, while the central region is more vulnerable to the fluctuations of demand-side pressure. At the same time, backward regions are stagnating due to the lack of positive spatial spillover effects

References

Balatoni, A., & Pitz, M. (2012). A működőtőke hatása a bruttó nemzeti jövedelemre Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, 59(1), 1-30.

Balogh, E., Boldizsár, A., Gerlaki, B., & Kóczián, B. (2018). Developments in the GDP-GNI Gap in Hungary and the CEE Region. Financial and Economic Review, 17(3), 57-84. doi: http://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.3.5784

Bivens, J. (2017). A ‘high-pressure economy’ can help boost productivity and provide even more ‘room to run’ for the recovery. Report. Economic Policy Institute, Washington D.C. Retrieved from: http://epi.org/118665

Callaghan, C.W. (2021). Lessons and insights from the global productivity slowdown: A research management agenda. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1945775

Casi, L., & Resmini, L. (2017). Foreign direct investment and growth: Can different regional identities shape the returns to foreign capital investments? Environment and Planning, C, Politics And Space, 35(8), 1483–1508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417690906

Cutrini, E. (2019). Economic integration, structural change, and uneven development in the European Union. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 50, 102–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.007

Czirfusz, M. (2020). Foglalkoztatás. In Czirfusz, Márton (szerk.) Területi kihívások és területi politikák Magyarországon, 2010-2020 (pp. 11-17). Budapest: Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Regionális Kutatások Intézete.

Egyed, I., & Rácz, Sz. (2020). The role of territorial capital in urban renewal in a non-core Central European city. Deturope, 12(3), 108-132.

European Commission (2020). The 2021 Ageing Report. Underlying Assumptions & Projection Methodologies. Institutional Paper 142. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2765/733565

Eurostat (2018, May 28). 4% of EU citizens of working age live in another EU Member State. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8926076/3-28052018-AP-EN.pdf/48c473e8-c2c1-4942-b2a4-5761edacda37

Éltető, A., & Alguacil, M. (2020). Global flows, local conditions and productivity spillovers: the case of the Central and Eastern European countries. Cuadernos Económicos De ICE, 100, 81-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2020.100.7119

Éltető, A., & Sass, M. (2021). A kapitalizmus változatai és az ipar 4.0 a visegrádi országokban. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68(5), 490-514. doi: 10.18414/KSZ.2021.5.490

Fiaschi, D., & Lavezzi, A.M. (2007). Productivity polarization and sectoral dynamics in
European regions. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29(3), 612–637.

Gál, Z. (2019). Az FDI szerepe a gazdasági növekedés és a beruházások területi differenciálódásában Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66(6), 653-686. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2019.6.653

Gál, Z., & Singh, D. (2021). Impact of FDI on economic growth, re-industrialization and regional disparities in Emerging Europe. International Journal of Business Excellence, forthcoming. doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2021.10041944

Győrffy, D. (2021). Felzárkózási pályák Kelet-Közép-Európában két válság között. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68(1), 47-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2021.1.47

Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications, Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby021

Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M., Diemer, A. (2020). Falling into the Middle-Income Trap? A Study on the Risks for EU Regions to be Caught in a Middle-Income Trap. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: https://doi.org/10.2776/02363

Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464605

Lengyel, I., & Kotosz, B. (2018). The catching up processes of the regions of the Visegrad Group countries. Comparative Economic Research, 21(4), 5-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0024

Lengyel I., & Varga A. (2018). A magyar gazdasági növekedés térbeli korlátai – helyzetkép és alapvető dilemmák. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65(5), 499-524. doi: https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.5.499

Lux G. (2017a). Industrial competitiveness: beyond path-dependence. In: Lux G., Horváth Gy. (eds.) The Routledge handbook to regional development in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 29-46). London – New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315586137-3

Lux G. (2017b). A külföldi működő tőke által vezérelt iparfejlődési modell és határai Közép-Európában. Tér és Társadalom, 31(1), 30-52. doi:10.17649/TET.31.1.2801

McCann, P., & Vorley, T. (eds.) (2021). Productivity and the Pandemic. Challenges and Insights from Covid-19. Cheltenham (UK) – Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374607

MNB (Magyar Nemzeti Bank) (2016). Növekedési jelentés. Budapest: Magyar Nemzeti Bank. https://www.mnb.hu/kiadvanyok/jelentesek/novekedesi-jelentes/2016-12-09-novekedesi-jelentes-2016-december

MNB (Magyar Nemzeti Bank) (2020). Termelékenységi jelentés. Budapest: Magyar Nemzeti Bank. https://www.mnb.hu/kiadvanyok/jelentesek/termelekenysegi-jelentes/termelekenysegi-jelentes-2020-november

Myant, M. (2018). The Limits to Dependent Growth in East-Central Europe, Revue de la régulation, 24(2nd semester, Autumn 2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.13351

Piketty, T., & Novokmet, F. (2018). 2018, the year of Europe. Le Blog de Thomas Piketty. 16 January 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/piketty/2018/01/16/2018-the-year-of-europe/

Stojčić, N., & Orlić, E. (2019). Spatial dependence, foreign investment and productivity spillovers in new EU member states. Regional Studies, 54(8), 1057-1068. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1653451

Zsibók, Zs. (2019). Extrapolative techniques’ predictive capacity in the spatial downscaling of the Hungarian gross domestic product. Hungarian Statistical Review, 2(2), 51-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.35618/hsr2019.02.en051
Published
2022-05-14
How to Cite
Zsibok, Z. (2022). Changing economic positions of the regions during the post-crisis decade in Hungary. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 14(2), 125-142. Retrieved from https://www.tjeb.ro/index.php/tjeb/article/view/357
Section
Articles