Fiscal stability in political discourse: the Romanian case

Keywords: Fiscal policy, fiscal stability, political discourse analysis, Romania


This article investigates the political resistance to fiscal stability institutions in Romanian context, as revealed in political discourse. To ascertain the a priori political predisposition against the fiscal stability framework, the theoretical findings of the public choice school of economics are utilized. Insights from the political discourse analysis body of literature are employed to the study of discourse against established fiscal stability institutions. Since the consensus arising from this literature is that politics is both acting and talking, the unit of analysis in our examination is the statement that can be classified as political discourse. After briefly analyzing the broader institutional context that provides the background for political discourse, the main storylines against fiscal stability recently emerged are reviewed. Seeking to determine the traits of the dominant political discourse against fiscal stability displayed by Romanian politicians in recent years, a quantitative assessment of the usage of these storylines is given. We find that publicly expressed disagreement with established fiscal stability institutions from the part of politicians and high-ranking bureaucrats has drastically increased over the analyzed period. The research has also revealed that the most employed storyline has been the one that belittles the significance of fiscal stability if the state uses the fiscal revenues for investing in transport infrastructure.

Author Biography

Radu SIMANDAN, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest

Assistant Lecturer PhD


Anghel, I. (2015). De ce să fim noi campioni la austeritate când alţii cheltuiesc şi astfel se dezvoltă? [Why should we be the champions of austerity while others spend and thus develop?], Ziarul financiar, 21 July. Retrieved from [accessed 24 April 2016].

Breazu, M. (2009). Boc va cere majorarea deficitului bugetar [Boc to ask for budget deficit increase]. Radio Romania Actualităţi, 6 July. Retrieved from [accessed 24 April 2016].

Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy (Vol. 3). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: the political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

Calmfors, L., & Wren-Lewis, S. (2011). What should fiscal councils do? CESifo Working Paper, no. 3382.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Introduction. Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Psychology Press.

Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.

Gunning, J. P. (2003). Understanding democracy. An introduction to public choice. Taiwan: Nomad Press.

Gwartney, J. D., Stroup, R. L., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). Macroeconomics: private and public choice, 13th Edition, Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

IREF (2012). Taxation in Europe. The yearly report on the evolution of European tax systems. Edited by Pierre Garello.

Law, (2010). Legea responsabilităţii fiscale nr. 69 [Fiscal responsibility law]. Retrieved from [accessed 12 May 2016].

Niskanen, W. (1994). Bureaucracy and public economics. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.

North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2004.14497617.

Sargent, T. J., & Wallace, N. (1981). Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. FRB Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 8, 1-17.

Şimandan, R. (2017). Political resistance to fiscal stability institutions: the case of Romania. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. [Online]. 04, pp 219-228. Retrieved from

Şimandan, R. (2009). Thinking about bureaucracy: Mises versus Niskanen, Romanian Economic Journal, 4(34), 85-96.

van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11-52. DOI: 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

von Mises, L. (1962). The ultimate foundation of economic science. An essay on method. Princeton, New Jersey: van Nostrand. (2010). Berceanu: România nu iese din recesiune dacă FMI nu acceptă creșterea deficitului [Berceanu: Romania will not exit the recession if the IMF does not accept an increase in the budget deficit], 3 May. Retrieved from [accessed 24 April 2016].

How to Cite
SIMANDAN, R. (2018). Fiscal stability in political discourse: the Romanian case. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 10(1), 104-119.